Customer well damaged
Tool loss or an operational error can create downhole, lost-production, and well-control allegations.
Try a different word, or check the spelling.
A tool you send down a customer's well can be harder to recover than equipment lost at the surface. Downhole and retrieval terms deserve their own review, without treating your servicing policy as the owner's well-control protection.
Talk with The Southern Agency about your operation, policy terms, and the information carriers need.

You send crews, workover units or wireline equipment to service customer wells. A lost tool string can lead to allegations about downhole damage and lost production, while surface-fluid releases and road accidents create different claims.
The Southern Agency can help you evaluate your specific servicing tasks and mobile unit operations to select coverage that fits your contractor risks without assuming ownership of the customer's well.
Tool loss or an operational error can create downhole, lost-production, and well-control allegations.
Workover rigs and wireline units face transport, site, and handling losses.
Servicing can contaminate soil or water beyond the immediate work area.
Crews face struck-by and pressure injuries and frequent road journeys between leases.
Policies to ask about. Which ones fit depends on your operations, your contracts, and the carrier’s forms.
These hypothetical examples are not agency claim results. Whether a loss is covered depends on the facts, policy terms, and applicable exclusions.
A tool string is lost during workover and the operator alleges well damage and lost production. Specialist liability scope needs review against downhole, custody and worked-on-property exclusions. Retrieving or replacing your tool, repairing the well and paying the operator's lost output are separate interests, not one automatic GL payment.
Servicing fluids escape the immediate work area and affect nearby land. Accepted contractor pollution terms may address covered cleanup or third-party claims. Substance, site, work phase, reporting and well-control restrictions matter; a fluid-handling promise in the master agreement does not insure every release cost.
A workover truck collides with another vehicle between customer sites. Auto terms may address covered third-party injury or damage, with own-truck repair under selected physical-damage benefits. Confirm the mounted unit and carried tools separately; their operating and transit treatment need not match the road chassis.
Start with the work you do and the questions your current policies leave unanswered. Carrier options depend on your location, risk, and underwriting. Explore our approach.
Not automatically. Customer-well, custody, downhole, and work exclusions require specialist scope review.
Suitable mobile equipment terms can protect declared units in operation and transit. Tool and retrieval restrictions matter.
Fluid releases can create cleanup duties ordinary GL may exclude, including claims after the work is finished.
They can allocate substantial duties, but those promises must independently fit policy scope and applicable law.
Frequent remote travel creates road risk. Mounted equipment, trailers, and hauled tools require coordinated terms.
Services, pressure, units, tools, travel, crews, and losses inform underwriting, not one standard rate.
Bring your questions, current policies, and relevant contracts. An agent can review coverage terms, exclusions, and the information carriers ask for, then explain the options available to you.