Cash moving through the floor
Funds pass between the cage, tables and payouts, creating theft and robbery exposure at several points.
Try a different word, or check the spelling.
Your security team's response can raise different liability questions from a fall on the gaming floor. Guest-injury protection needs to fit security and alcohol operations, not just add a larger limit to a premises policy.
The Southern Agency can help review your actual security duties and cash, data and hospitality interests.

You run a gaming floor where funds move between the cage, tables and payouts while guests use lounges and parking areas. Missing cash, a guest allegation and compromised player records create different costs, not one kind of gaming loss.
The Southern Agency can review your floor, cash custody, security and hospitality duties alongside existing insurance. We can help separate money loss, guest allegations and data response, with each policy's accepted activities and exclusions checked rather than treating one total limit as cover for them all.
Funds pass between the cage, tables and payouts, creating theft and robbery exposure at several points.
Crowded gaming and parking areas can involve falls, altercations, and allegations about security work.
Loyalty and payment systems may hold information that creates notification and liability costs after a breach.
Fire, water or equipment failure can interrupt parts of the floor and require repairs.
Bars, security staff and food operations each add injury or liability concerns distinct from a gaming loss.
Policies to ask about. Which ones fit depends on your operations, your contracts, and the carrier’s forms.
These hypothetical examples are not agency claim results. Whether a loss is covered depends on the facts, policy terms, and applicable exclusions.
A cage count reveals money missing after a shift. A crime form may reimburse covered theft if the money, actual cause, responsible person and discovery or reporting terms fit. Preserve counts and handoff evidence and investigate the loss; a discrepancy alone does not prove an employee stole money, and an accounting adjustment is not automatically a covered loss.
An intrusion exposes loyalty and payment records held in the casino's systems. Cyber may help pay covered investigation, response and privacy claims for the included event. Establish actual affected records and provider duties, with notice and consent checked. Processor assessments, stolen funds and interrupted gaming income have their own terms; a breach does not prove every one of those losses.
A guest slips on a spill on the gaming floor and alleges the casino failed to address it. GL may help with covered defense and damages, depending on actual duties and circumstances. Establish the cause and injury; the fall alone does not prove negligence or trigger the separate alcohol, security or worker arrangements.
Start with the work you do and the questions your current policies leave unanswered. Carrier options depend on your location, risk, and underwriting. Explore our approach.
Liability, crime, property, cyber, and employee forms address different casino losses. The actual floor, data, and cash custody determine what needs review.
Crime terms distinguish employee theft, robbery, and other money losses; document the cause and peak balances.
Cyber terms may help with a qualifying player-data breach, while ordinary equipment faults call for different coverage.
Gaming-license requirements vary. Verify the jurisdiction's requirements independently and compare them with the proposed program.
If alcohol is served, the party controlling service and the type of claim matter to liquor liability.
Higher limits can be useful for severe covered claims; review which underlying policies an excess form follows and the exclusions it retains.
Bring your questions, current policies, and relevant contracts. An agent can review coverage terms, exclusions, and the information carriers ask for, then explain the options available to you.